I think this is the first time I realized, after reading your comics for years, that the lines scattered around the speech bubbles indicate tone, besides the standard bold for emphasis. And it’s really only with the “MAN” here. Though looking back I suppose it’s rare enough that I can be excused for my ignorance…
I already noticed the speech bubbles, so I decided to look for something else I hadn’t noticed before. It turns out that Girl has an extremely odd haircut.
as a knitter busily working away at my knitting olympic challenge, i find the idea that knitting can’t be ambitious a little worrying. oh wait. i meant ‘insulting.’
All those starving madfolks in garrets, even the bad ones, were (and still are) highly ambitious. Having a successful career is a very low, unimaginative ambition.
I think the idea is that ambition has become a disqualifying characteristic in artwork seeking to be seen as authentic. Ambitious knitting has no problem portraying itself as authentic. Nor does ambitious coding. Nor does ambitious teaching. Nor does ambitious entrepreneurship, gardening or amateur soccer playing.
At first, for some reason, I read Grrl’s third panel speech bubble as “Most of those people starving in garretts weren’t very good food”. Then my contact lens realigned itself and I read it again and I was disappointed.
I was going to protest. Those people are extremely good food.
I see. That kinda seems, rather than an intellectual stance, a simple emotional reaction: “She wears too much jewelry. I don’t like it. She must be inauthentic.”
If the self-invention is more important than the self-expression, that is rightly decried as inauthentic. If the self-invention is simply a delivery device, then one simply uses anti-critical sentiment to increase one’s readership in defiance of…
More importantly, when in the HELL are Cat, Boy, and the Beatnik going to reenact the opening number from “Once More with Feeling?” We have waited long enough.
February 23, 2010
First!
I’ve got to agree with this, it’s sad that the only music remembered in 50 years will be mostly the stuff not worth remembering
February 23, 2010
The phrase “too damaged to recognize ambition” is worrying me
February 23, 2010
I think this is the first time I realized, after reading your comics for years, that the lines scattered around the speech bubbles indicate tone, besides the standard bold for emphasis. And it’s really only with the “MAN” here. Though looking back I suppose it’s rare enough that I can be excused for my ignorance…
February 23, 2010
I already noticed the speech bubbles, so I decided to look for something else I hadn’t noticed before. It turns out that Girl has an extremely odd haircut.
February 23, 2010
I’d go so far as to say every sentiment expressed in this comic is worrying. This is some strange anger.
February 23, 2010
They’re both right to a certain degree.
February 23, 2010
Aha. Thank you for explaining the knitting craze.
February 23, 2010
Girl seems to forget how the Calling first stopped being a Career…the Salons and all that. We’re due for another Courbet revolution.
February 23, 2010
as a knitter busily working away at my knitting olympic challenge, i find the idea that knitting can’t be ambitious a little worrying. oh wait. i meant ‘insulting.’
February 23, 2010
All those starving madfolks in garrets, even the bad ones, were (and still are) highly ambitious. Having a successful career is a very low, unimaginative ambition.
February 23, 2010
I think the idea is that ambition has become a disqualifying characteristic in artwork seeking to be seen as authentic. Ambitious knitting has no problem portraying itself as authentic. Nor does ambitious coding. Nor does ambitious teaching. Nor does ambitious entrepreneurship, gardening or amateur soccer playing.
February 23, 2010
At first, for some reason, I read Grrl’s third panel speech bubble as “Most of those people starving in garretts weren’t very good food”. Then my contact lens realigned itself and I read it again and I was disappointed.
I was going to protest. Those people are extremely good food.
February 23, 2010
I see. That kinda seems, rather than an intellectual stance, a simple emotional reaction: “She wears too much jewelry. I don’t like it. She must be inauthentic.”
If the self-invention is more important than the self-expression, that is rightly decried as inauthentic. If the self-invention is simply a delivery device, then one simply uses anti-critical sentiment to increase one’s readership in defiance of…
…oh. You’re doing that already. Right.
February 23, 2010
More importantly, when in the HELL are Cat, Boy, and the Beatnik going to reenact the opening number from “Once More with Feeling?” We have waited long enough.
February 23, 2010
It’s apparently knitting day in internet comix:
http://www.explosm.net/comics/1965/
February 25, 2010
Hey Adam, I think this is actually the first time the lines have ever been around the speech bubbles.
February 25, 2010
That crazy and art go together is an illusion. Yay grrl.
April 8, 2010
Grrl, being, well, Grrl, would surely not be fooled by the arbitrary and usually sexist/classist distinction between art and craft.
June 8, 2010
And the moral of the story is… a knitted sweater is not only beautiful and posh, but also warm and soft!
February 16, 2011
I wanna see what happens when Grrl reads Scott Westerfield – always assuming Dorothy can stand it.